Foodstagrammer? How about foodbooker?

One should really be more careful in what one posts online. I wonder if they feel this way about one of their most prominent members? Trying to "snark" on women who are suffering and you just might very well catch one of your own in the crosshairs. So the million dollar question is this: Do they really believe what they post? I wonder if we will ever get an answer to that question? Or will these "comments" suddenly disappear?

Stevie Ray Vaughan - The house is rockin'

If this house is a rockin' don't bother coming in LOLZ!

Click on over and check it out! Also scroll down to see "makeout" videos posted live for all to "see" (err hear)....

Father of the year?

Latest post from the mother/women haters on Facebook: Father of the year. Apparently HE doesn't whine about his situation.

No but he is sneaky, uses his kids hoping to get a handout in a sneaky way by making people feel sorry for him for doing what every other single mom has done for decades, being responsible! Then his first ex posts and apparently it seems there are two sides to this issue. Seems while he is busy being a "good dad" to these three, he has three others he has basically ignored. A quick gander at the court dockets of Ventura County, California would tell one that, if one takes the time to research the issue. One can also see there are allegations of something severe enough to warrant for the filing of a protection order in the first divorce.

I miss my ex.....but my aim is improving....

For those who suffered severe domestic or child abuse by their ex or witnessed child abuse by their ex, this is EXTREME. No other words are needed.

Did you miss me? I bet not!

Well did you miss me? Been busy with the holidays. Saving all the love for a rainy day when I knew you would be watching. And now you go and do it. You highlight a "wonderful" father on your blog. How great he is working odd jobs and raising her three wonderful kids, depending on handouts (but how dare we depend on "handouts") in order to feed, house, and clothe the children. What am I talking about? So many woman hating posts and so little time - where do I start? How about this little gem and then I will explain why it is so hypocritical.

Why is this bad? Why is their only complaint that he is against the reforms they are for and that he is "peddling a book"? Seems they have those on their side "peddling books" as well. Yet those on their side who "peddle books" are acceptable? Yep folks the hypocrisy on this one is screaming.

As you can see on this screenshot a member/commenter of the notorious hate group is writing a book. She has several likes from other members of this hate group. Yet that is acceptable that she "peddles her book"? Goose? Meet Gander.

Updated information for this special "reformer"

The writers of this blog were able to reach the target of these comments, and below is her reply to our questions:

Thank you for your compassion in directing me to these posts. I am fully aware. I do discuss my case with many and it should be a matter of public record since it has been discussed so often. Yes, my ex husband did "burn up the phone lines" to our local DCF abuse hotline. Yes there were numerous investigations done of me as well as him. There were never any charges brought against me because the numerous caseworkers who came to my house could see there was no abuse or neglect. After dozens of these calls, I begged the caseworkers to do something to stop them as it was counter productive to me, my job and most especially to our child. There was quite simply nothing they could (or would?) do. I personally believe they did not want to do anything, but I cannot prove that. My ex husband had several investigations launched against him as well in the course of the complaints against me and most of the calls against him were deemed indicated, whereas mine were unfounded.

Guess again, brainiac

I doubt this is who you think it is. But nice try playing. Try again. And even if this blog is done in the middle of the night or the middle of the day last time I looked there are 24 hours in a day, seven days in a week, and most people only work 35-40 hours a week. That is, unless they fall in a workaholic status. Then they are not caring for their families.

Children are second? Only over there....

Again since I covered this in a previous post, who says I have children? Who says I don't? Wouldn't you like to know?

No children were harmed in the creation of this blog (unlike your site).

Report to whom?

Report to whom? We take screenshots of public pages available for anyone on the Internet to view, and post them here so your site gets no traffic. Thanks for all the traffic btw!

TS our newest fan - where oh where would you be?

TS? Looking at your profile you are from Mexico? So why do YOU care about Florida alimony and child custody?

Cool thing about Google and Blogger? You can set your time zone to whatever you want it to be. I know what time zone it is, so I know how many hours to add or subtract to figure out when people are visiting. NEEEEEEXXXXXTTTT!!!! Oh and who says I have children? Who says I don't? You don't know now do you? Another cool thing about ANONYMOUS blogging, just like ANONYMOUS Facebook pages. Nobody knows who or what I am. I could be one of you.

They found me (not like I was hiding)

They found me! Should I run and hide? Nah, I have so much more juicy stuff to post. The comments on this post are a laugh riot!

Visitors (Part One - I feel special oh so special)

So interesting those who visit our little site. Two people in particular seem to spend AN AWFUL LOT OF TIME here. Like a bunch!! Even more than we do in fact. IP address: 71.193.202.180 has visited 9 times in the last 5 days, clicked on 40 different links before leaving. This specific IP address (computer/device) has visited at:

10.28. 05:28:41 PM
10.29. 03:52:32 AM
10.29. 03:53:53 AM
10.29. 03:54:17 AM
10.29. 03:56:29 AM
10.29. 03:56:45 AM
10.29. 03:57:41 AM
10.29. 03:58:05 AM
10.29. 04:28:38 AM
10.29. 04:35:36 AM
10.29. 04:35:43 AM
10.29. 04:35:55 AM
10.29. 04:47:26 AM
10.29. 04:47:58 AM
10.29. 05:34:56 AM
10.29. 06:59:56 AM
10.29. 07:08:29 AM
10.29. 08:42:53 AM
10.29. 10:59:02 AM
10.29. 01:06:50 PM
10.29. 01:07:03 PM
10.29. 01:07:17 PM
10.29. 01:07:44 PM
10.29. 04:48:36 PM
10.29. 06:19:03 PM
10.30. 04:29:36 AM
10.30. 06:03:07 AM
10.30. 06:13:22 AM
10.30. 07:19:02 AM
10.30. 10:41:34 AM
10.30. 10:55:57 AM
10.31. 05:00:23 AM
10.31. 07:52:09 AM
11.1. 06:23:51 AM
11.1. 08:22:20 AM
11.1. 04:09:32 PM
11.2. 05:19:58 AM
11.2. 05:20:05 AM


So there you have it. Ip Address visits my little old blog this many different times and days. I feel so special.

Now they will message complete strangers

Now I have seen everything. Message complete strangers to whine about having to pay alimony or that your current husband has to pay alimony. Wow now that is off the chain! Cra-Cra right there!

Be like Bill (ummm take your own advice?)

Why don't you "Be Like Bill" yourself?

Ant another post rooted completely in misogyny. It implies that if a woman is unable to engage in carnal relations with her significant other she is obliged to "perform" in other ways. Are women only to be used for this purpose? Petunia feels very sorry for the women married to these cretins.

Yet another "what does this have to do with family law reform" post

Yet again the "reformers" choose to post an incomplete story about a woman who is apparently having issues. We blocked her face and image and the link to the story as best we could, although it will not difficult to find the story online. This woman was sexually assaulted and do the "reformers" care about that fact? Not one iota! Do they care that it has been reported that she suffers from mental illness? Apparently not. And nothing was said about her having children in her care so again what does this have to do with alimony reform, child support or child custody? Not one thing!

And still another post spreading misinformation

Still awaiting contact from JH targeted in this comment, but knowing what I know form many years in advocacy, I see this all the time. False allegations made in order to discredit someone. CPS/DCF is required by law to investigate any allegations of the abuse or neglect of a child. Even if it means visiting a house dozens of times and the allegations are similar to other past allegations. The truth lies in what those allegations showed and what the final outcome of said allegations was. As I said, awaiting confirmation from JH.

Hmmm now we see alimony reformers are posting false information about people online yet again

I am curious EDM, how do YOU know that there are dozens of DCF investigations and how do you know how they turned out. I contacted the target of your comment and am awaiting an answer back from her.

And these have WHAT to do with child custody and alimony reform?

Again we see the pure unadulterated HATE directed at a target of the woman hating HAGS. Harassment in it's purest form. And again we ask - what does this have to do with alimony reform and child custody? ABSOLUTELY NOTHING! Simply some very angry and abusive folks who want to gaslight and silence an outspoken (and rightfully so) critic of the non-reform reforms now geared to be law.

More woman hating to come!

Thank you to our very first email from JS. I am super tired and my hooves still hurt from all that typing I did yesterday, but I am in possession of your screenshots (and the link did not work) and they will be posted ASAP! Toodaloo!! Until later my fine porcine pals!

More Bill Windsor Lies (Just for you FL HAGS!!!)

Bill Windsor Webisode - You Be the Judge (PSA 04)

Now they want to go crazy and believe Bill Windsor? Hmmmmm. Guess they believe everything they see on the internet right? How about This one?

Paul Elam and AVfM (A Voice for Men)....THE TRUTH

Again more solid evidence that these are truly mother haters, women haters. Sharing articles created by Paul Elam? Read this article to learn all about Paul Elam: How Men’s Rights Leader Paul Elam Turned Being A Deadbeat Dad Into A Moneymaking Movement

The above article is pretty in depth and while we understand it is quite lengthy, please do take the time to read it and become enlightened about the true mother and women haters amongst us.

Lawsuits against those who disagree?

Nothing like slandering someone - you have no idea if the woman you speak of is a "nut case". And is "nut case" an actual diagnosis?

Garnish her pay? Good luck with that one. I dug and found the woman you speak of. She does not make enough for her pay to be garnished (read federal laws about garnishment please). I contacted the person in question and she has been banned from your multitude of pages (we see you create one every time you change underwear). She wants your teeth? That is just odd. Victim blaming because she fell for a con artist? That's a great one coming from those who say they are victims of the family court system. I guess being a victim is only reserved for certain people? I also see that she shares things on Facebook, she reaches out to others to help and in digging even deeper she has spoken out about the family courts. How is she not trying to help others? Oh right because again YOU are all the most important people in the world and she is not helping YOU! Gotcha! I also think you meant to say it is right for children to have equal access to their parents. That is all well and good, in Utopia. However, we live in the real world where there are bad people, nasty people, people who should not be around children. We want to protect those children. Obviously since you TARGET children, you do not feel the same. Oh, unless it is your own children and again only if they do not "talk back". Yes you have worked your whole life. Last job we could find? Closed Caption Specialist at Home Shopping Network. Giggle Snort. And looks like she has moved on. She advocates for and shares many different stories and articles about the various social ills that plague our society. What do you share? Your latest trip to the spa and what you are eating for lunch or dinner.

Posting Addresses and Pictures of Children and family members

Again more lies and falsehoods posted by another arm of the main Facebook mother and women hating group. They allege that a certain "anti-law reform activist" (which we will get into that later) took the liberty to post addresses of the mother haters. Yet they supply no proof of said allegation other than their words. In the famous words of the now cancelled game show - show me the money! You cannot!
And again NC is kind? Compassionate? Caring? Then why does she target children in the manner she does? (more on that as this blog progresses)

Moving on Post Divorce? Not for him!

It has been said over and over again that some simply cannot move past their past. This is a prime example. Look at the screenshot and do a simple google search of the poster's name and you will see that this is indeed one who cannot move past. Looking at their public posts on Facebook excluding the "alimony" and "hating on the ex" posts, we see that he does indeed live a very full life. He goes on vacations with his new spouse. He does not seem to suffer from access to food or shelter or any of the necessary items required to live, in fact he seems to have many finer things in life. So why does he not move on? As we post more screenshots we will show that he does indeed go after his chidlren with a vengeance. Is it any wonder why they want nothing to do with him?

Female Serial Killers?

One small factoid left out of this was how many MALE serial killers there have been. So Petunia dug a little. Doing some very quick research she found this study: http://maamodt.asp.radford.edu/Serial%20Killer%20Information%20Center/Serial%20Killer%20Statistics.pdf AKA Serial Killer Statistics.

Screenshot of KNOWN serial killers from 1900 to 2010 by decade screenshot below the screenshot of the Facebook mother hating group:

I think we would be better served to believe a study done at an educational institution than the words of a mother hating blog and Facebook page, don't you?

A lady? Not likely

This blog will highlight how the person mentioned in this comment is far from a lady. Hundreds of screenshots have been collected by dozens of people.

Targeting Children and Hypocrisy

Found this on Facebook, one that has not yet been deleted or flagged. SHE can use initials because SHE is peaking of people over the age of majority. You however have been targeting children who are not. See the difference?

Threats?

Stating that a man who is facing felony level criminal charges and likely will be held to the fullest extent of the law is NOT threatening. Please get your facts straight. For more info on Bill Windsor and his sordid past visit Petunia Unplugged or joeyisalittlekid blogs for a running commentary on all of Bill's adventures. I don't have the time nor the energy to duplicate what is already readily available online.

Targeting Children

Now why oh why would these people go after children? After all I thought they were for what was best for children? Having both parents equally in their lives? I don't know about you, but I do not think I would want any child exposed to such cruelty.

Alimony Lies with Alzheimers

Another "share" by the ever infamous First Husband's group. This one is about an Alzheimer patient who must pay alimony. One small tidbit this group forgot to share is that the adult daughter of this man as well as the adult grandson of this man BEGGED the second wife to remove the video that was posted showing him in the midst of his suffering. We will NOT share that video so as to respect the family's wishes. however the posts on the Youtube video show the adult daughter asking the second wife to contact her because she (the adult daughter) was unable to reach sloppy seconds. Appears sloppy seconds was out at the movies. So much for assertions that sloppy seconds had to remain constantly at the bedside of this man.

Promoting abuse

Any type of abuse is worng but those at various Father's Rights (MOTHER HATING) groups don't seem to care one bit that they promote the abuse of mothers.

Welcome!

Welcome to "Exposing Mother Haters" blog. We plan to expose the groups around the World Wide Web who for whatever reason, have decided that "MOTHERS" would be a great group to target. Having tried to do so on Facebook and being told that it was a violation of Community Standards (what about the Community Standards that should protect a class of people - all mothers around the world?). This was reported to me, and this person is now facing three days in what has been fondly called Facebook Jail. She cannot post, comment, or contact anyone unless that person has messaged her previously. And the reason for this imposed hiatus by Facebook? She shared a hate filled page on her own wall and page and the owner of that page reported her for some sort of violation of Community Standards. What standard she violated was never shared and she has tried contacting Facebook to no avail. So I decided to take this off of Facebook (since I was long ago banned) and into a sphere over which they have no control. Pick and choose my battles? Well, this is a battle because many sites are not as blatant as the offending site in the case of Facebook jail time. So I will expose them all here as I have the time. So keep watching here and learn who is safe and who is not. And it is all free game!


Rules/Laws regarding the posting of publicly posted comments AKA Screenshots under Fair Use Doctrine:

1. The purpose and character of the use: Reproduction for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship or research is not copyright infringement. This probably covers most blogs and personal websites, but there are other factors to consider.
2. The nature of the copyrighted work: The Supreme Court has said that this factor is often "not much help," but the nature of the original could become more important when dealing with digital works that may be reproduced not one time, but one million times, in a fraction of the time.
3. The amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole: If the original is 10,000 pages, and the culprit reproduces one page, that is probably not infringement. But, if the original is one page, and the culprit still reproduces one page, he has probably infringed on the copyright.
4. The effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work: This one gets fun. The Supreme Court has rejected an irrebuttable presumption that commercial reproduction eliminates the fair use defense, but reproduction for a commercial purpose may push the secondary use closer to infringement and farther away from fair use. This factor requires the court to consider the relevant market and the competitive atmosphere while simultaneously trying to increase the welfare of Americans, two often competing interests. For instance, although a corporation may limit many forms of unauthorized reproduction of its software, the FCC has stated that truthful, non-deceptive comparative advertising is both legal and important to a healthy marketplace.

They wanted a war, now they have one. Game on FUCKERS!