Trouble in Paradise??????

MRA and Fat Shaming

Well the good ol boys have found the Return Of Kings blog. You ask why does that name sound familiar? Well - that is the site for the now infamous "Roosh" who wants to make rape legal when on private property. And much like Farrell back in the 70's and 80's, when his philosophy was called out for the pure BS that it is, he retracts it, says he didn't mean it "that way", it was satire, he was quoted wrong...... The excuses from these women haters will never end. They want to rape women and children with no consequences. I say enough is enough, call these jerks out.

Who protects moms against dastardly dads?

If you go to the link included there is an audio file of the man speaking to what is presumed to be the mother. He has shared in the post above the audio file that the child is in Grade 2, so that would be approximately 6-8 years of age (six being the lowest and 8 being the highest). In the first 15 seconds of the video, the father admits to "grilling" the child about events taking place at the mother's house on at least 4 different occasions. Why is this acceptable behavior if it is for a father who has weekend/holiday parenting time? The child should not be questioned at all by either parent about what happens when they are with the other parent. This is out and out wrong, and the father should be punished by having parenting time removed until he no longer "brings" the child into his "spying" on the mothers household.

Reading comprehension at an all time low?

In no place have we at this blog ever stated that women do not make horrible life altering choices, nowhere do we state that women do not abuse. In fact we have pointed out that women do abuse HERE most recently. What we ARE however saying is that men abuse, sexually abuse specifically, and kill children (again specifically) more than women as shown in this screenshot from a report commissioned by the American Academy of Pediatrics:

and in this screenshot

So why must they continue to post stories about "bad" women? They exist folks, just not at the same rate as "bad" men. And NO, that does not mean we think all men are "bad". Just that men are "bad" at a higher rate than women. So there you have it!

And again clearly the problem with a presumption is that for those with limited funds or fear of an abusive spouse - equal justice is NOT attainable. And in those scenarios - children will suffer immense harm.

Who is abusing whom here?

Everyone of OUR posts is showing the abuse from the reformer side, and clearly can be shown to be posted AFTER the abuse they post. Our posts are NOT abusive as we are simply giving our OPINION as to the nature of their posts as well as leaving it up to you, our readers, to decide who is really the abuser in these situations. Showing those who accuse others of murder, calling out children (minor children at that), posting private medical information illegally obtained, and so much more - we ask you, the reader, who is abusive here?

Pizza Call? Or DV Call?

Giggle Snort? Or Snort Giggle?

Some doth protest much too loudly that they have NOTHING to do with the now infamous Mother Haters page on Facebook.

Retroactive? Or not? Governor Scott - take notice!

Again FOLKS!!! READ THEIR OWN WORDS ON THEIR OWN PAGES UNDER THEIR OWN NAME!!!!

Study by Patricia G. Schnitzer, PhD, and Bernard G. Ewigman, MD, MSPH (American Academy Of Pediatrics)

MRA are CONSTANTLY saying women abuse, neglect and kill children more than men. Here is a study of child deaths published by the American Academy of Pediatrics. The table below (screenshot from HERE ) proves this fact:

Out of a study group of 132 known perpetrators of child abuse deaths, 94 were male (over 70%) 25% were female and 3% of the cases, the gender of the perpetrator was unknown. Of mother and father perpetrators, almost twice as many biological fathers as mothers killed their children (19% of mothers and 34% of fathers). To our knowledge, the present study is the first analytic study of inflicted injuries among young children to show that it is the presence of adults (usually male) in the household who are unrelated to the child victim that accounts for the increased risk of fatal maltreatment in single-parent households, not single parenthood per se.We will present more facts and studies as time permits.

Badass on Facebook

A very easy MRA lie to deconstruct

In this "share" the MRA in Florida "claim" that women molest children at a much greater rate than men. This is patently untrue. I knew it to be untrue, yet due to family obligations and the more pressing nature of the lies (see our last post) told about those women who are speaking out about grotesquely unbalanced laws, we have been unable to research and post the truth.

Well it did not take long to find the truth as you can see in the two screenshots below. Link to actual page online HERE (http://www.victimsofcrime.org/media/reporting-on-child-sexual-abuse/statistics-on-perpetrators-of-csa).

And larger so you can actually read it without having to click on it:

Anyone choosing to take the time rather than send out myths as fact should read the report about abuse located HERE http://futureofchildren.org/futureofchildren/publications/docs/19_02_FullJournal.pdf rather than simply taking the words of an angry MRA who has a vested interest in showing that his gender does not commit heinous crimes such as these.

Targets and the Flying Monkeys who threaten and lie

Okay let's deconstruct this "comment". First NC states that the target is a troll and that the target will always be spinning her wheels. Statement of opinion as the target from what I can see in viewing her public comments and posts has helped many.

She then goes on to state that she could care less what the target has to say - and goes on to clarify the ways in which she does not care. If one does not care, it simply slides off one's radar. We here at EMH DO care. These flying monkeys are targeting innocent women, men and children in their vicious lies and comments.

Next statement of opinion (not fact); NC states that the target refuses to accept any responsibility for her life or the twists and turns it has taken. Again I do not see that in the various public posts she (the target) has made. I see the complete opposite; and from those I have interviewed, I hear the complete opposite. The target in this case HAS taken responsibility for the turns of her life, she has worked hard to overcome the obstacles placed in her path by accepting said RESPONSIBILITY.

The next line is the one we really want to focus on as it is the absolute worst one to be placed on the WWW in regards to the target. In having dug up archives (and quite happily paid for said archives) of newspaper accounts of what the target has shared to date, I do not see this "fact" stated anywhere in recorded accounts. Again, this is simply an unfounded vicious attack on the credibility of a caring mother, albeit a confused mother in some instances, nothing has ever been shown to vet the statements of NC.

So we here at EMH would like to issue a warning to all who would attack the credibility, in fact the very lives of those opposed to their actions with regards to family law issues. We are documenting these issues, people are aware of your lies. Our advice would be to discontinue the attacks on these women. No threats here, just simple statement of facts. One cannot be allowed unfettered immunity when discussing another person and causing irreparable harm to their character. In fact there are laws that have been made to keep such occurrences from happening. It is being noticed and one day will be "handled". That is all, now back to our regular scheduled programming.

Men versus women

Need we say more?

Whitewashing of comments and posts

Now we see how they operate. Whitewashing/cleansing of posts and comments made so they do not appear racist, misogynistic, anti-Semitic and more. This post originally had over 20 comments on it. Now only three remain? Gee who else "cleansed"? No wonder they like posting all the anti-Semitic comments and memes and the support they throw to Trump (more on their politic choices soon - and believe me that is a laugh riot when you see how they pick their candidates of choice!).

Oh and not to worry dearies, we have the whole post and all the comments in all their glory already saved. Can't hide from it now...

"Mean Girls" and Racism....

Below screenshot was posted in response to an article written about a woman of color who has had enough of the lies of the elected representatives of her state. This ain't the only one either folks. And "Mean Girls" (or boys) are too chicken shit to use their real names, they have to hide behind their page name. Not to worry though, their "kind" is quickly becoming extinct.

New "Mean Girl" has joined the club!!

Hey TB! I see the trio has added a new mean girl to their little circle. Rather than listen to a woman who is trying to explain away attacks from other mean girls about issues she might have had, you decide to go "mean girl" on her and be nasssstyy. Very mean girl of you.

Heyyy Jealousy Part 2

Jealous about THIS?!?!?!?!?!? You can have him. Money isn't everything LMAO!!!!

Heyyyyyy Jealousy!!!

Jealous? Now that is the funniest thing Petunia has ever heard. So many "thoughts" to address in this little screenshot, but let's start with the first. As we have shown - high school wannabes who post "make out" videos are not ones we are likely to be "jealous" of. Shoe fetish? VH? Nah not really. Evil vicious, racist, anti semitic women? Again, not likely either. Next few posts, we will share some of the new wives/girlfriends and you be the judge lol.